<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 919 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302394</link>
    <description>Where a sentencing order permits direct payment of compensation to the complainant, the Magistrate may record that payment and make corresponding entries in the fine register without insisting on prior deposit in court, on proof through a memo or acknowledgment. The procedure is different where compensation forms part of a fine under Section 357(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, because fine-register and accounting requirements then apply, while compensation awarded separately under Section 357(3) stands on a different footing. The applicable Criminal Rules of Practice govern recording, collection, remittance, and accounting of fines and compensation. Finality of a criminal revision does not justify reopening the matter for a fresh settlement after disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 12:55:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 919 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302394</link>
      <description>Where a sentencing order permits direct payment of compensation to the complainant, the Magistrate may record that payment and make corresponding entries in the fine register without insisting on prior deposit in court, on proof through a memo or acknowledgment. The procedure is different where compensation forms part of a fine under Section 357(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, because fine-register and accounting requirements then apply, while compensation awarded separately under Section 357(3) stands on a different footing. The applicable Criminal Rules of Practice govern recording, collection, remittance, and accounting of fines and compensation. Finality of a criminal revision does not justify reopening the matter for a fresh settlement after disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>