<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Commissioner (Appeals) Must Independently Assess Stay of Demand Requests, Not Bound by CBDT Circulars, Acting Quasi-Judicially.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63628</link>
    <description>Stay of demand - 1st respondent as the appellate authority exercises quasi-judicial powers. Power to consider prayer for stay is incidental and ancillary to the power to hear appeals. As a quasi-judicial authority, Commissioner (Appeals) is not bound by the administrative circulars issued by CBDT. He has to apply his own independent mind in the facts and circumstances of each case. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 08:15:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 08:15:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Commissioner (Appeals) Must Independently Assess Stay of Demand Requests, Not Bound by CBDT Circulars, Acting Quasi-Judicially.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63628</link>
      <description>Stay of demand - 1st respondent as the appellate authority exercises quasi-judicial powers. Power to consider prayer for stay is incidental and ancillary to the power to hear appeals. As a quasi-judicial authority, Commissioner (Appeals) is not bound by the administrative circulars issued by CBDT. He has to apply his own independent mind in the facts and circumstances of each case. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 08:15:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>