<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1049 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422789</link>
    <description>The penalties imposed on Mr. Pawan Kumar Arora and Mr. Amrit Pal under Section 112 of the Customs Act were set aside by the court due to insufficient evidence of their involvement in smuggling activities. However, the penalty on Mr. Rajeev Kumar was reduced from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 25,000 based on strong evidence of his intent to receive smuggled gold, despite the gold not being found on him. The court highlighted the importance of corroborative evidence and deemed retracted statements inadequate for penal actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1049 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422789</link>
      <description>The penalties imposed on Mr. Pawan Kumar Arora and Mr. Amrit Pal under Section 112 of the Customs Act were set aside by the court due to insufficient evidence of their involvement in smuggling activities. However, the penalty on Mr. Rajeev Kumar was reduced from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 25,000 based on strong evidence of his intent to receive smuggled gold, despite the gold not being found on him. The court highlighted the importance of corroborative evidence and deemed retracted statements inadequate for penal actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>