<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1044 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422784</link>
    <description>Money-laundering prosecution under the PMLA failed where the record showed no material that the petitioners were involved in the scheduled offence, dealt with proceeds of crime, or projected any such property as untainted. The petitioners were only cited as witnesses in the CBI investigation, and the charge-sheet did not assign them any cognizable role in the predicate offence. Allegations about land purchase through companies and later sale of shareholding were unsupported by evidence of conspiracy, licence applications, or knowing participation in any process connected with proceeds of crime. The complaint, summoning order, and consequential proceedings were therefore liable to be quashed qua the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 08:13:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1044 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422784</link>
      <description>Money-laundering prosecution under the PMLA failed where the record showed no material that the petitioners were involved in the scheduled offence, dealt with proceeds of crime, or projected any such property as untainted. The petitioners were only cited as witnesses in the CBI investigation, and the charge-sheet did not assign them any cognizable role in the predicate offence. Allegations about land purchase through companies and later sale of shareholding were unsupported by evidence of conspiracy, licence applications, or knowing participation in any process connected with proceeds of crime. The complaint, summoning order, and consequential proceedings were therefore liable to be quashed qua the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>