https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422783 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash the eviction notice dated 08.06.2021, citing the availability of alternative remedies under the law. The court emphasized that the petitioner could approach the Special Court or the Appellate Tribunal for relief and disposed of the interlocutory application. The court acknowledged the petitioner's argument regarding the violation of natural justice but deemed remitting the matter futile as the property had already been seized under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. en-us Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 May 2022 08:13:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422783 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash the eviction notice dated 08.06.2021, citing the availability of alternative remedies under the law. The court emphasized that the petitioner could approach the Special Court or the Appellate Tribunal for relief and disposed of the interlocutory application. The court acknowledged the petitioner's argument regarding the violation of natural justice but deemed remitting the matter futile as the property had already been seized under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422783