<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1038 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422778</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was stated to be admissible on construction and architectural services where the services were used for repair and renovation of an existing factory building and plant, because the exclusion for construction-related services was said to apply to initial setting up, not to repair or renovation of an existing unit. Credit was also stated to be admissible on insurance-related services, including group mediclaim, group personal accident, and motor vehicle insurance, where they were treated as employee-welfare and business-linked services with nexus to manufacture rather than personal consumption. The disputed disallowance, demand, penalty, and interest were said to be set aside on those issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1038 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422778</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was stated to be admissible on construction and architectural services where the services were used for repair and renovation of an existing factory building and plant, because the exclusion for construction-related services was said to apply to initial setting up, not to repair or renovation of an existing unit. Credit was also stated to be admissible on insurance-related services, including group mediclaim, group personal accident, and motor vehicle insurance, where they were treated as employee-welfare and business-linked services with nexus to manufacture rather than personal consumption. The disputed disallowance, demand, penalty, and interest were said to be set aside on those issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>