<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1034 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422774</link>
    <description>In a cheque dishonour prosecution filed after expiry of the prescribed period, the court must consider whether sufficient cause exists for the delay under the amended statutory scheme before taking cognizance. Issuance of process cannot replace the required judicial determination on limitation and condonation, but the proceedings are not to be quashed outright solely because the complaint was late. The complainant must be given an opportunity to explain the delay, and the trial court must decide cognizance afresh in accordance with the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 08:13:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1034 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422774</link>
      <description>In a cheque dishonour prosecution filed after expiry of the prescribed period, the court must consider whether sufficient cause exists for the delay under the amended statutory scheme before taking cognizance. Issuance of process cannot replace the required judicial determination on limitation and condonation, but the proceedings are not to be quashed outright solely because the complaint was late. The complainant must be given an opportunity to explain the delay, and the trial court must decide cognizance afresh in accordance with the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>