<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1352 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302393</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune held that subsidy of Rs. 89.73 crore received under the Maharashtra PSI scheme was a capital receipt, linked to setting up industrial units in less developed areas, and therefore not chargeable to tax for AY 2014-15. As a corollary, the subsidy was excluded from operating revenue for determining ALP under TNMM for the Manufacturing segment. The Tribunal further upheld the DRP&#039;s view that customs duty differences could not justify reducing comparables&#039; margins absent evidence of different duty rates. In transfer pricing, Bharat Earth Movers Ltd. was excluded from the comparables following earlier precedent, while JCB India Ltd. was retained. The AO/TPO was directed to restrict TP adjustment only to international transactions in the Manufacturing segment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1352 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302393</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune held that subsidy of Rs. 89.73 crore received under the Maharashtra PSI scheme was a capital receipt, linked to setting up industrial units in less developed areas, and therefore not chargeable to tax for AY 2014-15. As a corollary, the subsidy was excluded from operating revenue for determining ALP under TNMM for the Manufacturing segment. The Tribunal further upheld the DRP&#039;s view that customs duty differences could not justify reducing comparables&#039; margins absent evidence of different duty rates. In transfer pricing, Bharat Earth Movers Ltd. was excluded from the comparables following earlier precedent, while JCB India Ltd. was retained. The AO/TPO was directed to restrict TP adjustment only to international transactions in the Manufacturing segment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>