<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2071 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302371</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the issue of the disallowance of the Business Development Commission back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, directing a thorough examination of relevant documents. The Tribunal upheld the decision allowing the set off of loss from one STP unit against business income from other units, following the precedent set by the Apex Court. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, while the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 May 2022 15:47:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2071 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302371</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the issue of the disallowance of the Business Development Commission back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, directing a thorough examination of relevant documents. The Tribunal upheld the decision allowing the set off of loss from one STP unit against business income from other units, following the precedent set by the Apex Court. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, while the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>