https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302381 A family settlement evidenced by a written panchayat resolution, receipts and consistent conduct was treated as valid proof that plaintiffs No. 3 and 4 relinquished their rights in suit schedule items No. 1 and 2, even though no registered conveyance was executed; the settlement was acted upon, so partition of those items was denied. For suit schedule item No. 3, the evidence of continued family cultivation and possession showed that a later patta in the defendant's name did not establish exclusive self-acquisition; the property was treated as held for the family, and all five co-sharers were entitled to equal shares. en-us Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Sep 2025 17:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302381 A family settlement evidenced by a written panchayat resolution, receipts and consistent conduct was treated as valid proof that plaintiffs No. 3 and 4 relinquished their rights in suit schedule items No. 1 and 2, even though no registered conveyance was executed; the settlement was acted upon, so partition of those items was denied. For suit schedule item No. 3, the evidence of continued family cultivation and possession showed that a later patta in the defendant's name did not establish exclusive self-acquisition; the property was treated as held for the family, and all five co-sharers were entitled to equal shares. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302381