<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1256 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302378</link>
    <description>Regular bail was considered on the principle of parity where the petitioner&#039;s alleged role was stated to be identical to that of a co-accused who had already been enlarged on bail. The court treated the petitioner&#039;s request as requiring similar treatment in light of the co-accused&#039;s bail status and the comparable attributed conduct. On that basis, regular bail was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1256 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302378</link>
      <description>Regular bail was considered on the principle of parity where the petitioner&#039;s alleged role was stated to be identical to that of a co-accused who had already been enlarged on bail. The court treated the petitioner&#039;s request as requiring similar treatment in light of the co-accused&#039;s bail status and the comparable attributed conduct. On that basis, regular bail was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>