<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 902 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302377</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted in an IPC case where the petitioner relied on identical allegations in a connected FIR in which bail had already been allowed. The court noted that the custody position and stage of trial were similar to the connected matter, and the State did not oppose the request. On that basis, bail was ordered subject to furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court or Duty Magistrate concerned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 902 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302377</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted in an IPC case where the petitioner relied on identical allegations in a connected FIR in which bail had already been allowed. The court noted that the custody position and stage of trial were similar to the connected matter, and the State did not oppose the request. On that basis, bail was ordered subject to furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court or Duty Magistrate concerned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>