<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1249 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302388</link>
    <description>The Allahabad HC extended interim protection on the basis of parity with interim orders in identical matters, noting that the similarity of the issue and the operation of those orders were undisputed. It followed the reasons recorded in the earlier order relied upon by the petitioner and directed exchange of affidavits. Payment of GST on grant of mining lease royalty remained stayed pending further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 14:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1249 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302388</link>
      <description>The Allahabad HC extended interim protection on the basis of parity with interim orders in identical matters, noting that the similarity of the issue and the operation of those orders were undisputed. It followed the reasons recorded in the earlier order relied upon by the petitioner and directed exchange of affidavits. Payment of GST on grant of mining lease royalty remained stayed pending further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>