https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422762 HC allowed the writ, holding the goods and vehicle could not be detained where they were dispatched under valid invoices and a second e-way bill was bonafide due to COVID-19 disruptions. The court found seizure and related orders arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14, quashed the detention order, release order and subsequent notices, and directed immediate release of the goods and vehicle. Respondents were ordered to pay costs of Rs.50,000 to each petitioner (total Rs.1,00,000) within four weeks. en-us Tue, 17 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Sep 2025 14:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422762 HC allowed the writ, holding the goods and vehicle could not be detained where they were dispatched under valid invoices and a second e-way bill was bonafide due to COVID-19 disruptions. The court found seizure and related orders arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14, quashed the detention order, release order and subsequent notices, and directed immediate release of the goods and vehicle. Respondents were ordered to pay costs of Rs.50,000 to each petitioner (total Rs.1,00,000) within four weeks. Case-Laws GST Tue, 17 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422762