<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1018 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422758</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the issue of the inflated credit balance of RIL back to the CIT(A) for reevaluation based on new evidence. The addition of fittings sold with pipes was upheld, and the addition of unexplained sundry creditors was also upheld due to lack of evidence provided by the Assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of thorough examination of evidence and adherence to accounting standards in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1018 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422758</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the issue of the inflated credit balance of RIL back to the CIT(A) for reevaluation based on new evidence. The addition of fittings sold with pipes was upheld, and the addition of unexplained sundry creditors was also upheld due to lack of evidence provided by the Assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of thorough examination of evidence and adherence to accounting standards in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>