<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1003 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422743</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleting the penalties for all the assessment years involved. The penalty notices and orders were found to be defective due to the lack of specific charges, and the penalty proceedings were deemed invalid. The Tribunal emphasized the need for specific findings of concealment or inaccurate particulars and the judicial exercise of discretion in imposing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2022 09:40:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1003 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422743</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleting the penalties for all the assessment years involved. The penalty notices and orders were found to be defective due to the lack of specific charges, and the penalty proceedings were deemed invalid. The Tribunal emphasized the need for specific findings of concealment or inaccurate particulars and the judicial exercise of discretion in imposing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>