<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 982 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422722</link>
    <description>DTA clearances made with Development Commissioner approval can qualify for exemption under Notification No. 23/2003-CE where the cleared goods are similar to the exported goods and the record supports that position. The article notes that authorised product descriptions, a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate, and the absence of contrary departmental evidence were sufficient to establish similarity for precision optical components and related assemblies. On that basis, denial of the exemption was unsustainable, and the resulting duty demand and penalty could not stand. The discussion emphasises that mere lack of further technical proof from the assessee does not justify refusal of the exemption when the surrounding record points to similarity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 21:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 982 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422722</link>
      <description>DTA clearances made with Development Commissioner approval can qualify for exemption under Notification No. 23/2003-CE where the cleared goods are similar to the exported goods and the record supports that position. The article notes that authorised product descriptions, a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate, and the absence of contrary departmental evidence were sufficient to establish similarity for precision optical components and related assemblies. On that basis, denial of the exemption was unsustainable, and the resulting duty demand and penalty could not stand. The discussion emphasises that mere lack of further technical proof from the assessee does not justify refusal of the exemption when the surrounding record points to similarity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>