<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 980 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422720</link>
    <description>The Court found the respondent&#039;s delay in adjudicating objections to default assessment under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act unreasonable, despite technical arguments raised. Emphasizing the importance of timely resolution, the Court directed the respondents to establish an online mechanism for notice intimation. The writ petition was disposed with an order for objection disposal within 15 days, requiring the petitioner&#039;s representative to appear for a speaking order. A penalty of Rs. 7,500/- was imposed for respondent&#039;s procrastination, to be deposited within two weeks. Non-compliance would prompt further court action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2022 09:39:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 980 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422720</link>
      <description>The Court found the respondent&#039;s delay in adjudicating objections to default assessment under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act unreasonable, despite technical arguments raised. Emphasizing the importance of timely resolution, the Court directed the respondents to establish an online mechanism for notice intimation. The writ petition was disposed with an order for objection disposal within 15 days, requiring the petitioner&#039;s representative to appear for a speaking order. A penalty of Rs. 7,500/- was imposed for respondent&#039;s procrastination, to be deposited within two weeks. Non-compliance would prompt further court action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>