<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 975 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422715</link>
    <description>Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is not excluded by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but it must be used sparingly and only in exceptional cases. An arbitral tribunal that has terminated proceedings for non-filing of a statement of claim may recall that termination on sufficient cause being shown and permit the claim to be filed. Where the grievance is that the tribunal has not decided recall applications at all, the complaint is failure to exercise jurisdiction rather than an attempt to stall arbitration. On the stated facts, the petitions were maintainable only to seek a decision on the recall applications, and the matter was remitted for a reasoned hearing and determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2022 09:38:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 975 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422715</link>
      <description>Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is not excluded by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but it must be used sparingly and only in exceptional cases. An arbitral tribunal that has terminated proceedings for non-filing of a statement of claim may recall that termination on sufficient cause being shown and permit the claim to be filed. Where the grievance is that the tribunal has not decided recall applications at all, the complaint is failure to exercise jurisdiction rather than an attempt to stall arbitration. On the stated facts, the petitions were maintainable only to seek a decision on the recall applications, and the matter was remitted for a reasoned hearing and determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>