<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 971 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422711</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine transactions under section 40A(2)(b) and restrict disallowance under section 14A to exempt income. The appellant&#039;s objections to various adjustments were considered, with some upheld and others requiring further examination. The Tribunal emphasized the retrospective nature of the deletion of clause (i) of section 92BA, invalidating certain transfer pricing adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2022 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 971 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422711</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine transactions under section 40A(2)(b) and restrict disallowance under section 14A to exempt income. The appellant&#039;s objections to various adjustments were considered, with some upheld and others requiring further examination. The Tribunal emphasized the retrospective nature of the deletion of clause (i) of section 92BA, invalidating certain transfer pricing adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>