<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Learning from case of Indus Towers Ltd. Writ petitions - petitioner is expected to approach the Court with clean hands so suppression of facts or wrong facts and statements before Courts must be avoided.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10408</link>
    <description>Petitioners invoking discretionary writ jurisdiction must present complete and accurate liability computations; omission or misstatement of a known Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) obligation that materially understates tax liability constitutes gross suppression and can justify refusal to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction and referral of issues to the appropriate appellate forum, with directions that subsequent adjudicators not be influenced by earlier observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 19:08:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 19:08:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Learning from case of Indus Towers Ltd. Writ petitions - petitioner is expected to approach the Court with clean hands so suppression of facts or wrong facts and statements before Courts must be avoided.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10408</link>
      <description>Petitioners invoking discretionary writ jurisdiction must present complete and accurate liability computations; omission or misstatement of a known Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) obligation that materially understates tax liability constitutes gross suppression and can justify refusal to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction and referral of issues to the appropriate appellate forum, with directions that subsequent adjudicators not be influenced by earlier observations.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 19:08:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>