<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 969 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422709</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the show cause notice and final assessment order under the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the availability of an appeal remedy before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal). The petitioner&#039;s active participation in the assessment process precluded judicial review, with the court emphasizing the assessing officer&#039;s duty to follow higher authority&#039;s orders. The court declined to entertain the petition, citing the petitioner&#039;s failure to exhaust statutory remedies. Additionally, the court imposed costs on the petitioner&#039;s advocate for alleged disrespectful behavior, highlighting the importance of utilizing available appeal mechanisms before seeking judicial intervention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 19:06:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 969 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422709</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the show cause notice and final assessment order under the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the availability of an appeal remedy before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal). The petitioner&#039;s active participation in the assessment process precluded judicial review, with the court emphasizing the assessing officer&#039;s duty to follow higher authority&#039;s orders. The court declined to entertain the petition, citing the petitioner&#039;s failure to exhaust statutory remedies. Additionally, the court imposed costs on the petitioner&#039;s advocate for alleged disrespectful behavior, highlighting the importance of utilizing available appeal mechanisms before seeking judicial intervention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>