https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302356 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by deleting the remarks made by the High Court against the judicial officer, emphasizing that the remarks were unnecessary and unjustified. The Court highlighted the importance of judicial decorum and restraint, stating that judges should refrain from making derogatory remarks unless absolutely necessary for the case's decision. The Supreme Court found the High Court's criticism of the officer to be improper and unwarranted, noting that the officer had acted within his judicial capacity, even if his decision was deemed incorrect. en-us Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 May 2022 15:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302356 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by deleting the remarks made by the High Court against the judicial officer, emphasizing that the remarks were unnecessary and unjustified. The Court highlighted the importance of judicial decorum and restraint, stating that judges should refrain from making derogatory remarks unless absolutely necessary for the case's decision. The Supreme Court found the High Court's criticism of the officer to be improper and unwarranted, noting that the officer had acted within his judicial capacity, even if his decision was deemed incorrect. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302356