<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 1015 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302355</link>
    <description>A third party could not found territorial jurisdiction or an independent cause of action on a legal opinion rendered by a solicitor to its client, where the substantive dispute lay elsewhere and no part of the cause of action arose in the chosen forum. Allegations attacking that opinion as mala fide or improper were held unnecessary, scandalous and vexatious, and were liable to be struck out under Order 6 Rule 16 CPC. As no real cause of action was disclosed against the second defendant, the plaint was not maintainable against that defendant and the second defendant&#039;s name was liable to be struck off.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 15:06:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 1015 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302355</link>
      <description>A third party could not found territorial jurisdiction or an independent cause of action on a legal opinion rendered by a solicitor to its client, where the substantive dispute lay elsewhere and no part of the cause of action arose in the chosen forum. Allegations attacking that opinion as mala fide or improper were held unnecessary, scandalous and vexatious, and were liable to be struck out under Order 6 Rule 16 CPC. As no real cause of action was disclosed against the second defendant, the plaint was not maintainable against that defendant and the second defendant&#039;s name was liable to be struck off.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>