https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302350 A document labelled as a letter of subrogation was construed by its operative terms, not its title, because it expressly assigned, transferred and abandoned the insured's rights against the wrongdoer in favour of the insurer and authorised recovery in the insurer's own name. On that construction, the instrument was held to operate as an assignment rather than a mere subrogation letter. The insurer's suit was therefore maintainable, and the challenge based on nomenclature was rejected. The appeal failed and the decree in favour of the insurer was sustained. en-us Tue, 09 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 May 2022 12:16:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302350 A document labelled as a letter of subrogation was construed by its operative terms, not its title, because it expressly assigned, transferred and abandoned the insured's rights against the wrongdoer in favour of the insurer and authorised recovery in the insurer's own name. On that construction, the instrument was held to operate as an assignment rather than a mere subrogation letter. The insurer's suit was therefore maintainable, and the challenge based on nomenclature was rejected. The appeal failed and the decree in favour of the insurer was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302350