<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 951 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Ld. Pr. CIT&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under section 263 was without merit as the AO&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under section 80IC was legally sustainable. The Tribunal held that the income items in question had a direct nexus to the eligible business, justifying their inclusion for the deduction. As a result, the Tribunal quashed the Ld. Pr. CIT&#039;s order and reinstated the AO&#039;s assessment order, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 09:01:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 951 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Ld. Pr. CIT&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under section 263 was without merit as the AO&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under section 80IC was legally sustainable. The Tribunal held that the income items in question had a direct nexus to the eligible business, justifying their inclusion for the deduction. As a result, the Tribunal quashed the Ld. Pr. CIT&#039;s order and reinstated the AO&#039;s assessment order, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>