<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 934 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422674</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the expenditure on MPLS/VPN and lease line connectivity is of a revenue nature, allowing full deduction in the year it was incurred. The Tribunal held that the expenditure qualifies for deduction under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, overturning the disallowance by the lower tax authorities. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the orders of the lower tax authorities were overturned in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 934 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422674</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the expenditure on MPLS/VPN and lease line connectivity is of a revenue nature, allowing full deduction in the year it was incurred. The Tribunal held that the expenditure qualifies for deduction under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, overturning the disallowance by the lower tax authorities. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the orders of the lower tax authorities were overturned in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>