<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 932 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422672</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that in the absence of proper investigation and concrete evidence, the Municipal rateable value or the actual rent declared by the assessee, whichever is higher, should be adopted as the fair rent under Section 23(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the additions made by the Assessing Officer were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 09:00:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 932 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422672</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that in the absence of proper investigation and concrete evidence, the Municipal rateable value or the actual rent declared by the assessee, whichever is higher, should be adopted as the fair rent under Section 23(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the additions made by the Assessing Officer were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>