https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422650 The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to the existence of genuine disputes between the parties. The operational creditor failed to substantiate their claims adequately, and the Tribunal emphasized the importance of rejecting applications in the presence of genuine disputes, following the precedent set in "Mobilox Innovative Private Limited vs. Kirusa Software Private Limited." The application was dismissed without costs. en-us Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 May 2022 12:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422650 The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to the existence of genuine disputes between the parties. The operational creditor failed to substantiate their claims adequately, and the Tribunal emphasized the importance of rejecting applications in the presence of genuine disputes, following the precedent set in "Mobilox Innovative Private Limited vs. Kirusa Software Private Limited." The application was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422650