https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422649 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the classification of services provided, finding that they did not fall under "Man Power Recruitment or Supply Agency Service." For the period before June 2012, the demand for service tax was set aside. For the period after June 2012, the matter was remanded to re-examine the liability based on clarifications in a CBEC Circular. The quantification of the demand was also remanded for accurate computation. Penalties imposed were deemed unwarranted and set aside. Appeals for different periods were allowed with consequential relief, setting aside demands and penalties while remanding certain matters for re-examination. en-us Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 May 2022 08:59:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422649 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the classification of services provided, finding that they did not fall under "Man Power Recruitment or Supply Agency Service." For the period before June 2012, the demand for service tax was set aside. For the period after June 2012, the matter was remanded to re-examine the liability based on clarifications in a CBEC Circular. The quantification of the demand was also remanded for accurate computation. Penalties imposed were deemed unwarranted and set aside. Appeals for different periods were allowed with consequential relief, setting aside demands and penalties while remanding certain matters for re-examination. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422649