<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 905 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand of Central Excise duty of Rs. 27,20,409/- on the appellant for failing to pay duty on molasses procured from Khandsari Sugar units, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision. Interest on the duty was also confirmed, with the Tribunal agreeing that interest is compensatory. The imposition of Redemption Fine was set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals), and the penalty of Rs. 27,20,409/- under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, was upheld by the Tribunal. The appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal modifying the order on the interpretation of Rule 4(2) but maintaining the confirmation of duty, interest, and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 22:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 905 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand of Central Excise duty of Rs. 27,20,409/- on the appellant for failing to pay duty on molasses procured from Khandsari Sugar units, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision. Interest on the duty was also confirmed, with the Tribunal agreeing that interest is compensatory. The imposition of Redemption Fine was set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals), and the penalty of Rs. 27,20,409/- under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, was upheld by the Tribunal. The appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal modifying the order on the interpretation of Rule 4(2) but maintaining the confirmation of duty, interest, and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>