<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 898 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422638</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the assessee for statistical purposes and remanded both issues back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for further examination and fresh adjudication. The Tribunal stressed the importance of proper documentation and substantiation of claims under the Income Tax Act, directing a comprehensive verification of facts and evidence in both cases involving unexplained cash deposits and the disallowance of interest claimed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 08:58:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 898 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422638</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the assessee for statistical purposes and remanded both issues back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for further examination and fresh adjudication. The Tribunal stressed the importance of proper documentation and substantiation of claims under the Income Tax Act, directing a comprehensive verification of facts and evidence in both cases involving unexplained cash deposits and the disallowance of interest claimed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>