<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 884 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, finding no merit in the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal concluded that the Revenue failed to disprove the genuineness of the transactions, and the addition did not meet the statutory criteria. As a result, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 08:31:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 884 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, finding no merit in the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal concluded that the Revenue failed to disprove the genuineness of the transactions, and the addition did not meet the statutory criteria. As a result, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>