<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 877 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422617</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order unsustainable due to inconsistent outcomes in similar cases, breaching the uniformity principle under Article 14. It was noted that the issuance of checklists by the Customs Broker (CB) did not amount to fraud under the Customs Act. Therefore, the appeal by M/s. Ramesh Transport Company was allowed, and the order imposing penalties, forfeiting security deposit, and revoking the CB license under the CBLR, 2018 was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 08:30:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 877 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422617</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order unsustainable due to inconsistent outcomes in similar cases, breaching the uniformity principle under Article 14. It was noted that the issuance of checklists by the Customs Broker (CB) did not amount to fraud under the Customs Act. Therefore, the appeal by M/s. Ramesh Transport Company was allowed, and the order imposing penalties, forfeiting security deposit, and revoking the CB license under the CBLR, 2018 was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>