<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 865 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422605</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, setting aside the demand beyond the normal period and all penalties imposed on the appellants. The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed, sustaining the demand of duty and interest within the normal period. The confiscation of goods and imposition of fines and penalties were not upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2023 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 865 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422605</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, setting aside the demand beyond the normal period and all penalties imposed on the appellants. The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed, sustaining the demand of duty and interest within the normal period. The confiscation of goods and imposition of fines and penalties were not upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>