<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 856 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422596</link>
    <description>Provision for bad and doubtful debts remains deductible under section 36(1)(viia) when the statutory ceilings are met and the amount is, in substance, connected with such provision rather than a non-qualifying reserve. On that footing, the Tribunal upheld deletion of the disallowance. Expenditure on centenary celebrations, gift distribution and society relief fund was also treated as wholly and exclusively for business under section 37(1), being linked to business promotion and institutional activities with no personal element. The Tribunal therefore sustained deletion of the business expenditure disallowance and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s challenge on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 856 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422596</link>
      <description>Provision for bad and doubtful debts remains deductible under section 36(1)(viia) when the statutory ceilings are met and the amount is, in substance, connected with such provision rather than a non-qualifying reserve. On that footing, the Tribunal upheld deletion of the disallowance. Expenditure on centenary celebrations, gift distribution and society relief fund was also treated as wholly and exclusively for business under section 37(1), being linked to business promotion and institutional activities with no personal element. The Tribunal therefore sustained deletion of the business expenditure disallowance and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s challenge on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>