<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 854 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422594</link>
    <description>The tribunal overturned the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order issued under section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2017-18, which challenged an assessment based on unverified purchases and gross profit estimation. The tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner lacked jurisdiction as the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. It upheld the assessment completed by the Assessing Officer, emphasizing the importance of the AO&#039;s examination of purchases and estimation of profit based on available evidence. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, quashing the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 08:29:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 854 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422594</link>
      <description>The tribunal overturned the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order issued under section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2017-18, which challenged an assessment based on unverified purchases and gross profit estimation. The tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner lacked jurisdiction as the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. It upheld the assessment completed by the Assessing Officer, emphasizing the importance of the AO&#039;s examination of purchases and estimation of profit based on available evidence. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, quashing the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>