<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (6) TMI 43 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28950</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Commissioner of Wealth-tax must provide reasons for decisions under section 18(2A) of the Wealth Tax Act. Failure to do so when reducing penalties does not meet legal requirements. Previous decisions were cited to emphasize the necessity of providing reasons in quasi-judicial orders. The Court set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and directed a fresh decision in compliance with the law. The petitions challenging the order were allowed, and the rules were made absolute, with no order regarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:59:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (6) TMI 43 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28950</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Commissioner of Wealth-tax must provide reasons for decisions under section 18(2A) of the Wealth Tax Act. Failure to do so when reducing penalties does not meet legal requirements. Previous decisions were cited to emphasize the necessity of providing reasons in quasi-judicial orders. The Court set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and directed a fresh decision in compliance with the law. The petitions challenging the order were allowed, and the rules were made absolute, with no order regarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>