<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Challenge to Section 263 Order: Assessing Officer&#039;s Inquiry on Commission Payments Deemed Proper Despite Revenue&#039;s Objections.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63525</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - an order which is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue - When all the evidences relating to commission/brokerage paid by assessee both to domestic as well as overseas agents are available on record, what more evidences are required to be furnished by the assessee is beyond comprehension. When the facts on record reveal that the Assessing Officer has made proper enquiry on the issues, on which limited scrutiny was directed, by merely referring to Explanation 2(a) to section 263 of the Act, the assessment order cannot be held to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue by making a general observation that proper enquiry, which the Assessing Officer ought to have made was not made. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 08:58:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 08:58:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Challenge to Section 263 Order: Assessing Officer&#039;s Inquiry on Commission Payments Deemed Proper Despite Revenue&#039;s Objections.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63525</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - an order which is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue - When all the evidences relating to commission/brokerage paid by assessee both to domestic as well as overseas agents are available on record, what more evidences are required to be furnished by the assessee is beyond comprehension. When the facts on record reveal that the Assessing Officer has made proper enquiry on the issues, on which limited scrutiny was directed, by merely referring to Explanation 2(a) to section 263 of the Act, the assessment order cannot be held to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue by making a general observation that proper enquiry, which the Assessing Officer ought to have made was not made. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 08:58:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>