<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 818 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422558</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Customs Authority&#039;s classification of the goods as flat-rolled products under Tariff Item 72099000, dismissing the appeal. The ruling emphasized that the goods did not qualify as waste and scrap under existing legal definitions and parameters. The court highlighted the importance of physical examination and the intended use of the goods in determining their classification, affirming that an advance ruling does not provide blanket permission for all types of waste and scrap imports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 818 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422558</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Customs Authority&#039;s classification of the goods as flat-rolled products under Tariff Item 72099000, dismissing the appeal. The ruling emphasized that the goods did not qualify as waste and scrap under existing legal definitions and parameters. The court highlighted the importance of physical examination and the intended use of the goods in determining their classification, affirming that an advance ruling does not provide blanket permission for all types of waste and scrap imports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>