<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 49 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28946</link>
    <description>Rectification under the income-tax record is confined to errors apparent from the relevant assessment year and cannot be used to reopen issues needing fresh inquiry or material from another year. A reduction of car depreciation from 30% to 10% was invalid because the newly purchased car qualified for the applicable additional allowance; a purported profit on sale of the car also could not be taxed through rectification and had to be pursued, if at all, through escaped-income proceedings. Vehicle maintenance expenditure could not be cut by relying on a prior year&#039;s assessment record. Rectification of the life insurance premia deduction was valid only to the extent of the admitted excess allowance apparent on record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:40:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 49 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28946</link>
      <description>Rectification under the income-tax record is confined to errors apparent from the relevant assessment year and cannot be used to reopen issues needing fresh inquiry or material from another year. A reduction of car depreciation from 30% to 10% was invalid because the newly purchased car qualified for the applicable additional allowance; a purported profit on sale of the car also could not be taxed through rectification and had to be pursued, if at all, through escaped-income proceedings. Vehicle maintenance expenditure could not be cut by relying on a prior year&#039;s assessment record. Rectification of the life insurance premia deduction was valid only to the extent of the admitted excess allowance apparent on record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>