<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 810 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422550</link>
    <description>A Resolution Professional&#039;s power to take possession under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code extends only to assets in which the corporate debtor has subsisting ownership rights, and not to property excluded by the statutory explanation as a third-party asset or one held under contract. Where a tea estate lease had expired by efflux of time under the Transfer of Property Act, the corporate debtor retained no surviving ownership right in the estate. On that basis, the Resolution Professional could not claim possession and control of the tea estate through the insolvency process, and the claim for handing over possession was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 08:56:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 810 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422550</link>
      <description>A Resolution Professional&#039;s power to take possession under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code extends only to assets in which the corporate debtor has subsisting ownership rights, and not to property excluded by the statutory explanation as a third-party asset or one held under contract. Where a tea estate lease had expired by efflux of time under the Transfer of Property Act, the corporate debtor retained no surviving ownership right in the estate. On that basis, the Resolution Professional could not claim possession and control of the tea estate through the insolvency process, and the claim for handing over possession was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>