https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422532 An undertrial accused under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act was granted bail because prolonged incarceration of nearly eight years, slow progress of the trial, and the limited material already recorded did not justify continued pre-trial detention. The Court weighed the restrictions in Section 43D(5) against the stage of the proceedings and the absence of any reasonable prospect of early completion of trial. Bail was therefore allowed, with release subject to conditions to be fixed by the trial court. en-us Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 May 2022 21:00:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422532 An undertrial accused under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act was granted bail because prolonged incarceration of nearly eight years, slow progress of the trial, and the limited material already recorded did not justify continued pre-trial detention. The Court weighed the restrictions in Section 43D(5) against the stage of the proceedings and the absence of any reasonable prospect of early completion of trial. Bail was therefore allowed, with release subject to conditions to be fixed by the trial court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422532