<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 790 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422530</link>
    <description>The HC considered a petition challenging the denial of permission to travel to Dubai. The petitioner had previously received travel permission twice (in 2020 and 2021) with conditions that were fully complied with. The current application was denied solely on grounds of the petitioner&#039;s involvement in a significant cheating case involving approximately Rs.144.9 crores, without acknowledging previous permissions granted. The court noted that earlier travel permissions included conditions such as FDR deposit, providing addresses abroad, and passport surrender upon return. The matter was scheduled for further hearing to determine if permission should be granted despite the serious charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 790 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422530</link>
      <description>The HC considered a petition challenging the denial of permission to travel to Dubai. The petitioner had previously received travel permission twice (in 2020 and 2021) with conditions that were fully complied with. The current application was denied solely on grounds of the petitioner&#039;s involvement in a significant cheating case involving approximately Rs.144.9 crores, without acknowledging previous permissions granted. The court noted that earlier travel permissions included conditions such as FDR deposit, providing addresses abroad, and passport surrender upon return. The matter was scheduled for further hearing to determine if permission should be granted despite the serious charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>