<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 786 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422526</link>
    <description>The HC set aside GST authorities&#039; denial of Input Tax Credit to petitioners whose suppliers had registrations canceled retrospectively. The court remanded the cases for fresh consideration, directing the concerned officer to evaluate transaction genuineness, payment verification, and statutory compliance. The officer must determine if purchases were legitimate and made before supplier registration cancellations, comparing with relevant higher court precedents. If petitioners&#039; case aligns with established precedents, ITC benefit should be granted. The respondents were ordered to dispose of the cases within eight weeks after providing petitioners an opportunity for hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 786 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422526</link>
      <description>The HC set aside GST authorities&#039; denial of Input Tax Credit to petitioners whose suppliers had registrations canceled retrospectively. The court remanded the cases for fresh consideration, directing the concerned officer to evaluate transaction genuineness, payment verification, and statutory compliance. The officer must determine if purchases were legitimate and made before supplier registration cancellations, comparing with relevant higher court precedents. If petitioners&#039; case aligns with established precedents, ITC benefit should be granted. The respondents were ordered to dispose of the cases within eight weeks after providing petitioners an opportunity for hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>