<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 770 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422510</link>
    <description>Payments to non-resident student-recruitment agents were treated as marketing commissions, not fee for technical services, because the agents only promoted courses, referred students, and worked outside India. Ph.D. thesis evaluation payments were also outside fee for technical services, as evaluators merely applied academic expertise to assess work and did not render technical services to the payer. Faculty development payments for training and skill-upgradation were likewise excluded, with the treaty provision and absence of a permanent establishment preventing Indian taxation. The controlling test was whether the non-resident income was chargeable to tax in India; if not, no withholding obligation arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 770 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422510</link>
      <description>Payments to non-resident student-recruitment agents were treated as marketing commissions, not fee for technical services, because the agents only promoted courses, referred students, and worked outside India. Ph.D. thesis evaluation payments were also outside fee for technical services, as evaluators merely applied academic expertise to assess work and did not render technical services to the payer. Faculty development payments for training and skill-upgradation were likewise excluded, with the treaty provision and absence of a permanent establishment preventing Indian taxation. The controlling test was whether the non-resident income was chargeable to tax in India; if not, no withholding obligation arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>