<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1637 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302326</link>
    <description>Section 148(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires an appellant in a Section 138 conviction case to deposit at least 20% of the fine or compensation amount, and Section 148(2) grants sixty days from the order date for such deposit, with only a further extension of up to thirty days on sufficient cause. An appellate court cannot curtail the statutory sixty-day period by directing deposit within a shorter time, so a fifteen-day direction was unsustainable. However, where extension had already been granted, no basis existed for a further three-month enlargement, and only the additional thirty days permitted by statute could be allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 21:32:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1637 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302326</link>
      <description>Section 148(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires an appellant in a Section 138 conviction case to deposit at least 20% of the fine or compensation amount, and Section 148(2) grants sixty days from the order date for such deposit, with only a further extension of up to thirty days on sufficient cause. An appellate court cannot curtail the statutory sixty-day period by directing deposit within a shorter time, so a fifteen-day direction was unsustainable. However, where extension had already been granted, no basis existed for a further three-month enlargement, and only the additional thirty days permitted by statute could be allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>