<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (11) TMI 19 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28932</link>
    <description>For surtax capital computation, an amount standing to the credit of profit and loss account is treated as a reserve only if, in substance, it has been appropriated for business use and is not retained as a provision for a known liability or anticipated loss. The distinction turns on the substance, purpose, and the directors&#039; intention as reflected in the accounts. On the facts, the first year&#039;s surplus was an unallocated balance after specific provisions, with no earmarking for any contingency, while the second year&#039;s surplus had been merged with general reserve in the directors&#039; report and accounts, showing appropriation from the start of the new accounting period. The surplus was therefore included in capital computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:05:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (11) TMI 19 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28932</link>
      <description>For surtax capital computation, an amount standing to the credit of profit and loss account is treated as a reserve only if, in substance, it has been appropriated for business use and is not retained as a provision for a known liability or anticipated loss. The distinction turns on the substance, purpose, and the directors&#039; intention as reflected in the accounts. On the facts, the first year&#039;s surplus was an unallocated balance after specific provisions, with no earmarking for any contingency, while the second year&#039;s surplus had been merged with general reserve in the directors&#039; report and accounts, showing appropriation from the start of the new accounting period. The surplus was therefore included in capital computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>