<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1183 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302313</link>
    <description>A pattedar passbook carries a statutory presumption of correctness, but record-of-rights entries do not create title and cannot override urban land ceiling restrictions. Where proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 were still pending, the revenue authorities could not be compelled to alter registry entries, split pattas, or issue passbooks in a way that would pre-empt the statutory determination of excess vacant land. The entitlement to implement mutation-related orders depended on the landholder first succeeding in the ceiling proceedings. The writ appeal therefore succeeded to the limited extent that the direction to issue or implement passbooks at that stage was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 10:25:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1183 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302313</link>
      <description>A pattedar passbook carries a statutory presumption of correctness, but record-of-rights entries do not create title and cannot override urban land ceiling restrictions. Where proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 were still pending, the revenue authorities could not be compelled to alter registry entries, split pattas, or issue passbooks in a way that would pre-empt the statutory determination of excess vacant land. The entitlement to implement mutation-related orders depended on the landholder first succeeding in the ceiling proceedings. The writ appeal therefore succeeded to the limited extent that the direction to issue or implement passbooks at that stage was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>