<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 743 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422483</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision allowing the assessee to claim a proportionate deduction under section 80IB(10) for the Sector 7 project for the assessment year 2010-11. The Tribunal determined that both Sector 1 and Sector 7 were distinct projects, entitling the assessee to the deduction for the Sector 7 project. Additionally, the Tribunal found similarities in facts and circumstances in cross-appeals for subsequent assessment years, following precedent and dismissing all appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 08:43:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 743 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422483</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision allowing the assessee to claim a proportionate deduction under section 80IB(10) for the Sector 7 project for the assessment year 2010-11. The Tribunal determined that both Sector 1 and Sector 7 were distinct projects, entitling the assessee to the deduction for the Sector 7 project. Additionally, the Tribunal found similarities in facts and circumstances in cross-appeals for subsequent assessment years, following precedent and dismissing all appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>